A last ditch effort by Councillor Roy Avellaneda to reverse the new police and fire residency ordinance successfully passed by Councillor Giovanni Recupero failed on Monday night, June 4, in a close vote.
It represented seven years of twists and turns for Recupero’s number one issue and one that has been before the Council in several forms about a dozen times.
On Monday, the victory came in a narrow defeat of Avellaneda’s proposal, 5-6, which allowed the proposal to become the new law.
Those voting to keep the residency ordinance were Councillors Damali Vidot, Enio Lopez, Bob Bishop, Luis Tejada, Joe Perlatonda and Recupero – a one vote margin of victory.
Those voting to reconsider and repeal the ordinance were Councillors Yamir Rodriguez, Calvin Brown, Avellaneda, Leo Robinson and Judith Garcia.
“This is a good thing,” said Recupero. “It’s something the citizens of Chelsea wanted and I’ve fought for it for seven years solid. Now the councillors wanted it too. I think it’s good for the City and for the people. The police and fire can live in the neighborhood and understand the people and the people can understand them and respect them. The young men and women of the city will relate to them because they live in the same community.”
The matter will apply to anyone hired in the Police or Fire Department after July 31, 2018. It will require them to live in Chelsea for five years after starting on the job. After five years, they can move out of the city if they choose.
The negative came in that to get the measure, it had to become a collective bargaining issue. That meant that the entire Police and Fire Departments would get a raise in order to include the new condition in their contracts. Even those for whom the measure doesn’t apply will get additional pay to accept the new condition.
“Hey, it’s good for those on the department too,” said Recupero. “They’re all going to get a raise, but we’re going to get new officers that want to live in Chelsea.”
Councillor Leo Robinson said he was against the measure because of the cost. He said he was once in favor of residency, but that changed when he learned about the collective bargaining costs.
“The bottom line is you have 40 police living in the city and 26 firefighters right now,” he said. “ When we have to go and negotiate with the union that means 110 police and 96 firefighters get raises. That’s $200,000 we’ll have to give them. I think it’s foolish to do. They think it’s a great thing. You have Bob Bishop voting against the budget because he says it out of control and then he votes for this without knowing what it costs.”
The City Council voted in favor of a proposal put forward by City Manager Tom Ambrosino to limit the siting of recreational marijuana retail stores and cultivation facilities.
The vote came on an 8-2 majority after an amendment by Councillor Roy Avellaneda failed to get the eight votes needed for passage. Avellaneda and Councillor Calvin Brown voted against the City Manager’s proposal. Councillor Luis Tejada was absent from the meeting.
City Manager Tom Ambrosino said they have limited zoning areas for retail establishments to the Industrial Zone and the Highway Business zone. Marijuana cultivation and lab facilities would be limited to the Industrial Zone only.
The state Cannabis Control Commission (CCC) has issued regulations regarding the numbers of facilities allowed in each municipality and Chelsea could have up to four retail licensees. The CCC will begin accepting application on April 2 and will potentially begin issuing them on July 1 – though the July 1 date is still very much in the air at the state level right now.
Ambrosino said it was imperative for the City to get something on the books now to limit the locations for these establishments.
“I have proposed an ordinance to try to accommodate this new industry in a way I think is reasonable,” he said. “You do need to pass some ordinance to regulate this new industry to ensure the entire city isn’t open to establishments in this new industry.”
There was a great deal of discussion, though, before the vote was logged to pass Ambrosino’s proposal.
Avellaneda had an amendment that would have eliminated the Industrial Zones as an area for retail, and would have included the Shopping Center district instead – which is in places like the Mystic Mall/DeMoula’s and the Parkway Plaza.
He said siting cultivation facilities in the Industrial Zone is a no-brainer, but he said retail of any kind, even marijuana, doesn’t belong in an industrial area.
“This will be a storefront,” he said. “You don’t picture this in the middle of some warehouse where there are no stairs and a loading dock and lifts for pallets in front. When you think about the retail, we think of this, we should think of it like a jewelry store…You have no public transportation in the Industrial Zone. You’re not taking the bus down Marginal Street or Eastern Avenue…This proposal is drawn up by individuals thinking about this like it was 20 years ago and not today.”
Avellaneda had some measured support for his amendment, but it did eventually fail, getting only six of the eight votes needed.
Those voting for his amendment included Councillors Enio Lopez, Yamir Rodriguez, Bob Bishop, Giovanni Recupero, and Judith Garcia. Those voting against it were Councillors Damali Vidot, Calvin Brown, Leo Robinson, and Joe Perlatonda.
Three city councillors were honored by their colleagues on Monday night, Dec. 18, at their last Council meeting.
Councillors Matt Frank, Dan Cortell and Paul Murphy were honored for their service on the Council, and presented with plaques.
District 3’s Matt Frank was given a send-off by Councillor Judith Garcia.
Councillor Roy Avellaneda sent off District 8 Councillor Dan Cortell, saying it’s not an easy talk to represent Admiral’s Hill and the rest of the district as they are outspoken.
Finally, Councillor Damali Vidot gave a send off to District 1 Councillor Paul Murphy. She said Murphy was a mentor to her and was always willing to support her initiatives and petitions in the early days of her advocacy.
Councillor Roy Avellaneda made a stunning oration Monday night at the Council meeting regarding the accusations of ethics breaches that have been volleyed his way over the last few months – singling out a councillor, though not by name, and then calling for the councillor to be censured.
After the meeting, Avellaneda admitted that the councillor in question was Damali Vidot.
The shocking moment came when Council President Leo Robinson submitted an order calling for an Ethics workshop to be conducted for the Council, setting off Avellaneda on a defensive course.
Over the last few weeks, several allegations have been thrown towards Avellaneda in the course of a heated neighborhood discussion that involved his request to get eight two-hour parking spots near his coffee shop in Cary Square. Though Avellaneda recused himself from the parking issue – which was approved by the Parking Commission and then rescinded by the Council last week – and was out of the room for most of the debate and voting, many felt he had crossed a line by requesting zoning changes and parking changes as a sitting councillor for the benefit of his business.
On Monday, after Robinson’s order, Avellaneda castigated Vidot and one of her supporters, and called to the carpet Robinson as well for not preventing the allegations when he was out of the room.
Ironically, Vidot was not present at Monday’s meeting during the oration, but was out of the country on a leadership training trip.
“This is the second time that false charges of ethics violations have been made against myself,” he said, passionately. “At the last occurrence, someone associated with a certain councillor’s campaign made the allegations and then this councillor rose and made similar allegations. This is the second time a councillor has done this…This is false information being allowed adjacent one’s character. It’s the essence of the definition. I’m surprised that the person making charges is a fellow councillor at-large, some would say an adversary.
“Personal attacks in this forum are not allowed,” he continued. “These are grounds for censure. As president you had an obligation to stop it and you didn’t…Quite frankly, I don’t expect this behavior to be allowed. We shouldn’t be allowing personal political attacks in this Chamber; they shouldn’t be allowed here. That’s what put the City into receivership.”
Vidot had stood and delivered an impassioned speech two weeks ago during the first hearing on rescinding the Cary Square parking program, a meeting that was very heavily attended by neighbors and residents. She indicated at the time that the proposal by a sitting councillor for business purposes was shady and didn’t sit well with her.
Others made similar statements from the general public.
Reached on Tuesday, Vidot said she was out of the country and found it ironic that Avellaneda would complain about being attacked while he was not present to defend himself – and then would move to attack her when she was not there.
“The irony that my Council decorum in holding one accountable bothers some more than the appearance of impropriety by another is very telling of the culture that existed prior to my election,” she said. “If speaking of a colleague while they’re out of the room is grounds for censure, what does it mean to talk about them when they’re out of the country? Or is this the ‘boys only’ club rules? I have and will continue to speak truths standing on either side of the dais on behalf of the residents. In fact, it may work in one’s favor to keep me close rather than to allow me to wander to the other side where it’s all fair game.”
Robinson said his order for an ethics workshop was not targeted at Avellaneda or any other councillor, but was in general to answer questions members had about ethics and the Open Meeting Law – especially as it relates to social media.
One week after an idea was floated publicly by Councillor Roy Avellaneda to look into taking the Soldiers’ Home park (Malone Park) out of the state’s hands so the City could use it for youth sports programming, several councillors are lashing out and Avellaneda said it’s all politics.
This week, Councillor Luis Tejada, who represents part of the Park along with Councillor Matt Frank, said he is absolutely against any proposal to use the park for youth sports.
“I live directly across the street from the park,” he said. “For kids, we have 13-plus parks to play in. Question, how many parks do we have for the elderly and our veterans to go and be in peace and quiet? One, and now they want to take this away. The fact is that we do enough in this country to push our elderly and veterans aside so they don’t bother us and its a shame. We need to not allow this to happen. Not every park has to be set up for kids and young loiterers. Our elderly deserve respect. They have done their part in helping mold our city into what it is and it would be a shame to take the last place afforded to them just because some people feel they are not entitled.”
But Avellaneda said Tejada was playing politics.
He said he reached out to many councillors when he first starting thinking about the idea, back last spring when the playing field crisis first unfolded and it became apparent the City either needed a new field or needed to revisit the way it doled out its existing fields.
He said Tejada was open to the idea when they first spoke.
“If he had originally expressed his reservations and taken a position against this when I first talked to him, I wouldn’t have never gotten to the next step where we were meeting with the Soldiers’ Home,” he said. “For him to come out now and say he is totally against this, I ask why he mention he was against it six months ago when I first asked him about it…To do this now – being totally against it in the way he is – is bush league politics.”
Avellaneda said nothing was a done deal and it was simply an idea.
“Nothing was done in a vacuum and we never excluded the public or neighbors because, in fact, we never got to the point where we could get public input,” he said. “We were certainly going to get to that point. I was trying to find a solution to a problem. We had a long way to go.”
Councillor Damali Vidot, who initiated the discussion last year about the use of the playing fields.
She said Malone Park isn’t the answer, and looking at how the fields are doled out is what should be done first.
“I believe before the City starts to take away tranquil space from our beloved veterans and neighbors, we start to better manage our existing spaces,” she said. “We have a soccer field at Highland Park that has been completely monopolized by one entity under various names and catering to non-residents. Perhaps if we focused more on accountability and better management of those spaces, we could provide Chelsea youth the space they need as well as preserve space for our vets and neighbors during their golden years.”
A move by some city officials to look into the purchase of Malone Park next to the Soldiers’ Home from the state for badly-needed youth sports programming space has mounted no small controversy in the last week or so.
Malone Park, or the Soldiers’ Home park, is a large open field, passive park connected to the Soldiers’ Home complex and is owned by the state. The park has been in existence for decades and is often used by the immediate neighborhood and the veterans in the Soldiers’ Home. With a striking view of Boston and an air of quietness, it’s a place of peace.
However, in the last several months, the lack of space to accommodate youth sports games and practices has developed into an emergency situation, and City Councillor Roy Avellaneda said he eyed the large open space, which he said appears to be used very rarely, and thought it could be the quick solution to housing practices for youth football and soccer.
“We were being told that the Chelsea Pop Warner had nowhere to go and had to scramble to find practice space on the baseball field at Carter Park,” said Avellaneda. “We know we need more park space…I had my sights set on Malone Park because it’s very large and very underutilized. Most times I drive up there, there is no one up there…It’s not an active park or even a passive park use…That being the case, I talked to the City Manager about trying to get that park into the City’s system and out of the state’s hands to see if we can do something about youth sports.”
Avellaneda said he envisioned using the field mostly for practice space for the two youth football leagues, Chelsea Pride and Chelsea Pop Warner, as well as for youth soccer leagues. Avellaneda said he set up a meeting with the Soldiers’ Home and some state officials to discuss the matter further and did not find everyone as enthusiastic as he was.
“I was surprised to know there was any appetite for opposition to this because I didn’t think that trying to find kids a place to play would be something anyone would be working to fight,” he said. “Quite frankly, there’s a lot of space between the residences and the park, so any kid practicing football or kicking a soccer ball up there wouldn’t be half as noisy as Runway 33L. I would actually think that more activity up there would help to get rid of some nefarious dealings at the edge of the park that I have noticed. More activity there might push it back and keep it from creeping further up the Hill.”
But the Malone Park is turning out to be somewhat sacred ground, inexorably tied to the Soldiers’ Home and devoted to promoting the peace and quiet earned by those who fought for their country and now call the Home home.
It’s pit two major constituencies against one another – the veterans vs. the youth sports.
The Soldiers’ Home declined any official comment for this story.
However, some city councillors said that the Home is not excited or happy about the suggestion to put youth sports activities on its park.
Councillor Matt Frank said he does not support the idea whatsoever, and he represents a large part of the Home in his district.
“My feeling is there isn’t a lot of passive park space on this half of the city,” he said. “That field is heavily used. It may not look that way because you don’t see kids running around, but neighbors, seniors and veterans use it to sit and rest or to walk. That park is connected to the Soldiers’ Home for a reason. It’s supposed to be a place where the Soldiers’ Home residents can relax. We do need more field space for youth sports, but every single inch of the city doesn’t need to be programmed. If you wake up on a Saturday morning and want to kick the ball around with your 4-year-old, there aren’t a lot of places you can do that. I would really hesitate and have concerns about putting programming up there.”
Councillor Leo Robinson, who lives near the Park, said he has heard nothing but concerns from neighbors and the Home about the idea. He said there needs to be more done about policing the existing fields before expanding to areas like the Soldiers’ Home.
“Some of the neighbors up there have been speaking to me and they’re not in favor of changing the park,” he said. “Some of the veterans who walk the park are not in favor of changing the park either…In the process of getting control of the parks, we need to know who is playing on the parks and fields we have. That’s what we need to look at first. Are they Chelsea residents? Or are they coming from somewhere else? If they’re not from Chelsea, then we should do something about that.”
Frank said he believes now if the time to look at really creative things rather than the taking of existing parks from the state for a different use.
He said he would like to see ideas like building a parking garage for the airport rental cars along the waterfront, and transforming the top floor into a multi-use outdoor field that could be covered in the winter and used for indoor sports.
“I think now is the time to get creative and we need to find other solutions,” he said. “When we get the new Recreation Department in, we should look at how we are using our space we have.”
Avellaneda, however, said the time has really passed to plan long-term, and lots of kids need space for youth sports right now. With a large field in the City that appears mostly unused, he said it only makes sense to use it for a pressing need.
“I challenge anyone to go up there on a regular day at any hour and say that it isn’t underutilized,” he said. “In this City, the majority needs that space. If someone can tell me where else to find a park, then tell me where that might be.”
In what was a complete surprise to several observers and councillors at Monday night’s meeting, a block of five councillors rose up and nearly blocked the re-appointment of a long-time License Commission member, Ken Umemba.
Umemba was re-appointed in the end, on a 5-5 tie vote that was finally decided 24 hours later.
The move was what will likely be the first shot in a long battle for some councillors who want change on the License Commission – chiefly Councillor Roy Avellaneda, who previously service on Licensing before being elected to Council last year.
“I stand by my vote,” said Avellaneda. “I think we need someone on the board with restaurant and bar experience and we don’t have that. We have lost one appeal recently on Las Palmas at the state level and there is another appeal, on Plaza Mexico, that is awaiting a decision. The issues that are on that board still remain. I’m disappointed that despite my concerns I raised, the councillors decided to vote more on feelings and knowledge of the family over actual things that happen at the meetings. I’m just as concerned about the young man who was stabbed in Plaza Mexico and the young man who had his head cracked open and was pushed outside at Las Palmas. I just felt Ken Umemba wasn’t the right person to be on the board.”
The vote was seemingly a mundane re-appointment in what was a short and mundane meeting at the Council. However, as the roll call was read, suddenly there were several ‘no’ votes coming from members.
With Councillor Giovanni Recupero gone, there was an even number and so a 5-5 tie was the result. Those voting against Umemba were Matt Frank, Paul Murphy, Luis Tejada, Roy Avellaneda and President Dan Cortell.
At first, the ruling was that the 5-5 tie vote meant that Umemba was denied re-appointment, which sent a shockwave into the crowd – including his family members who were there to observe and speak on his behalf.
However, a day later it was determined that the City Charter actually has a special rule for appointments that end with a tie vote.
City Attorney Cheryl Watson Fisher said Section 4-2 of the Charter requires six votes to deny an appointment, which also means that a tie vote ends in an approval of any appointment.
“I’m in shock,” said Umemba’s wife, Joan Cromwell, after the vote. “I don’t know if it was some type of political situation. I don’t know if some councillors did their homework on his voting record and dedication to the board. It’s surprising. I thought the City was taking a positive step forward in terms of diversity and transparency. This is a step backward.”
Umemba is the only black member of the Commission, and has served on it for six years.
Councillor Matt Frank said he has been to meetings and he agrees with Avellaneda.
“It’s not personal,” he said. “I happen to think the Licensing Board needs to go in a different direction.”
Councillor Leo Robinson, who supported Umemba, said it was a bad scene.
“I think it’s unfortunate we have a person that has served on the Board for six year and those who voted against him never even had a conversation with him about it,” he said.
Umemba was present at a public meeting on Tuesday night and said he was happy to be back on the board.
Avellaneda said it’s only one of many changes he hopes to push on the Licensing Commission. He said he would advocate for several more changes in it’s membership.
“I would also advocate to take the ISD representative off the Commission and replace him with the City Attorney,” he said. “I know that requires a Charter Change, but I think we need to do that. The meetings aren’t recorded, the dates aren’t posted six months in advance, and you have business people waiting for months to get a simple license. That’s no way for the City to do business.”
Taking the gavel once again this January will be District 8 Councillor Dan Cortell, after he received unanimous support of his colleagues in their caucus Monday night.
The incoming Council met on Monday night for its annual caucus session to pick its officers, its seating position and its voting order for the 2016 session. Gone were many of the councillors that have served for decades and, in their place for the first time, were several new councillors who will take a place at the table next year.
Cortell was chosen as the president in a vote of 9-0. Missing from that vote was Councillor Giovanni Recupero, who has been tending to a family issue for a few weeks, and Councillor-elect Luis Tejada, who came in just after the vote.
Council President Leo Robinson – the dean of the Council – ran the meeting and kicked off the proceedings.
Councillor Paul Murphy nominated Cortell, and Councillor-elect Damali Vidot seconded that motion.
Then, Councillor-elect Yamir Rodriguez nominated Councillor-elect Roy Avellaneda for president.
Avellaneda, who has been running for the position over the last month, had apparently failed to secure the necessary votes and withdrew.
“I appreciate it, but I will withdraw,” he said.
He then threw his support behind Cortell, who was elected unanimously.
“I am honored to have been chosen to lead Council’s next session by both councillors I have worked with over the years and some who I’ve only recently gotten to know,” said Cortell. “From the many conversations that have taken place since, and even before elections were over, I’m most confident that all councillors put their name on a ballot, campaigned and ran to play their part in making Chelsea the best it can be. I have inherent respect for anyone who takes the leap from interested resident to elected official and am confident we’ll have an active and effective Council that, despite inevitable periodic disagreement, will work collectively and with City Manger Tom Ambrosino to better the City we have a shared passion to see reach its full potential.”
Following that, Vidot was chosen as vice president of the Council – a relative rarity that one who has yet to take a seat on the Council would have secured the votes needed to be second in the leadership chain.
“I’m excited to serve and am looking forward to working together with everyone to move Chelsea forward on a City Council that hears the needs of everybody,” she said.
She was chosen by a vote of 10-0, with Recupero absent.
Tapped to be the School Committee delegate was Councillor-elect Yamir Rodriguez of District 7.
Avellaneda returned the favor and nominated Rodriguez, which was seconded by Cortell.
The vote was a unanimous 10-0 with Recupero absent.
In other more mundane matters, the Council (using the same envelopes they’ve
Council Clerk Paul Casino spreads out the envelopes to help choose seating position as the Council caucused Monday night to choose a president for the 2016 session. In a unanimous vote, Councillor Dan Cortell was chosen for the position.
used since receivership, a nod to frugality) chose closed envelopes that contained numbers and determined where they would sit in the coming year.
Avellaneda chose number 1, meaning he will be on the far left, while Councillor Matt Frank chose number 10, which means he’ll be on the far right. In between, left to right, will be Paul Murphy, Enio Lopez, Recupero, Tejada, Vidot, Robinson, Judith Garcia, and Rodriguez. Cortell will be seated at the rostrum as the new president.
An official vote for officers will take place on inauguration night, Jan. 4, but the vote of the caucus most often stands
As the new configuration of the Council approaches a January inauguration, already plenty of politicking is being done to secure the transformed body’s new leader.
Council President Leo Robinson will be one incumbent who is returning to the Council, but it is typically frowned upon for one to seek a second term. He also apparently lacks the support even if he were pursuing it, which he isn’t.
That leaves three councillors who are now jockeying for the post, including Councillor-election Roy Avellaneda, Councillor Giovanni Recupero and Councillor Matt Frank.
The process will work itself out next month when the returning Council members and the newly elected members will sit down for a caucus on the subject. At that point, those in the room will pledge their support to their choice for president. The first to receive a majority will be tabbed as the designated choice. However, an official vote does not take place until right after the inauguration in January. Things can certainly change in that period of time, but the custom has been to stick with the caucus.
Avellaneda, who has been on the Council previously, said he is pursuing the post.
“I am pursuing council president and I’ve had a couple of conversations asking for support,” he said. “No one has officially committed yet. I hope they’ll look at my experience and willingness to work with everybody and the way I’ve been trying to consult them in getting prepared for the Council as a true sign of a leader. It’s not locked in yet. A few would support me and others are thinking about it.”
Councillor Matt Frank said he is actively pursuing it, and was the president just two years ago before Robinson.
“I am publicly poking around about it,” he said. “I would like to be president again. When I was president previously we opened up a lot of what we did and brought a lot of new people into the Chambers…I was fair with my colleagues, even those I disagreed with. I’ll work with everybody regardless. I have the track record to show for it and I’m open to the public.”
Talk around the coffee table indicated that Frank may have Councillor-elect Damali Vidot’s vote already in place, as he made a late season endorsement of her candidacy just prior to the election. Some have indicated that was a quid-pro-quo agreement, but neither confirmed that.
Meanwhile, Recupero did not publicly acknowledge his bid for president, but others have mentioned he is looking for support.
It is believed he might have the support of some of the incumbents on the Council and some of the newcomers that he helped in the past election.
Of course, nothing is set in stone on this internal Council scramble until much later next month, and just about anything can happen until the caucus is convened.
It’s tough to be an incumbent these days, and the national trend to oust those in office carried over to Chelsea Tuesday night when six new people out of 11 seats – creating a new majority – swept into office on a wave of voter excitement and candidate campaigning that hasn’t been seen here for a decade or more.
There were 2,832 ballots cast for a 21 percent voter turnout.
The most exciting race was the City Council at-Large race, but the most dramatic change came in the district seats, where every contested race resulted in the removal of the incumbent councillor.
But first, the at-Large race was where most of the hard campaigning had been done since the Preliminary Election in September. Old political sidewalk politics such as sign holding, campaign rallies and door knocking efforts, unheard of in Chelsea politics for years, became the norm as voters saw more of the candidates than in many previous contests.
Topping the ticket in the race was returning councillor Roy Avellaneda, who had served previously on the Council and decided to make a run once again after two failed state representative bids last year. The vote tally reflected as follows, with Avellaneda, newcomer Damali Vidot and Council President Leo Robinson.
Robinson was the only Council incumbent in a contested race to be re-elected.
•Calvin Brown, 970
•Todd Taylor, 798
•Deborah Washington, 380
The most surprising news of the night was that long-time Councillor Calvin Brown got knocked out of his seat. He trailed Robinson by only 18 votes, and said afterward he didn’t know if he’d go for a recount.
“That’s something to think about and maybe sleep on,” he said. “You have to take your time with that decision, but it was close.”
Avellaneda said he was very humbled and encouraged by the excitement that the race generated.
“It’s humbling to be honest,” he said. “It’s very exciting to go out there an get the support of the community I grew up in…I’m looking forward to working with our new city manager, our councillors, some of the incumbents, on making Chelsea a better place to live and work. We had a lot of excitement about this race and we haven’t seen that in years. Between School Committee, the district seats and the at-large races, we saw a type of atmosphere we haven’t seen since the first City Council was elected after the Charter passed…We need that excitement now to roll over and keep those people engaged in civic activities.”
Vidot, who had not intentions of ever running for City Council last year at this time, said she was humbled and found it hard to believe she had walked the path she had over the last several months.
She said voters responded to her message loud and clear, that City Hall isn’t representing the people and that there is a disconnect between City Hall and the neighborhoods.
“People clearly want change,” she said. “We have an almost entirely new City Council. The people have spoken and it’s time for us to respond. Until January, I’m going to read up and educate myself on the job and the responsibilities. I’m going to also keep my supporters close by and engaged so we can keep our momentum. I’m really looking forward to working with everybody.”
The District Council races were the most shocking, and where the real wave of new faces will be seen.
In District 2, Chelsea native Luis Tejada beat incumbent Chris Cataldo 160-137.
In District 4, long-time Councillor Paul Barton was beaten decidedly by activist Enio Lopez, 139-59.
In District 5, incumbent Councillor Joe Perlatonda had been edged out already in the Preliminary Election, leaving two challengers. The heir apparent had been Henry Wilson, a long-time community activist and Planning Board member. However, up and coming candidate Judith Garcia, who has youth on her side being in her 20s, surged in the campaign and beat Wilson, 164-109.
In District 7, newcomer Yamir Rodriguez, also in his 20s, beat out incumbent Clifford Cunningham, 155-123.
District 1 Councillor Paul Murphy, District 3 Councillor Matt Frank, District 6 Councillor Giovanni Recupero, and District 8 Councillor Dan Cortell were all unopposed.
The results will give the Council, as stated above, six new faces in January.
In the School Committee race, Shawn O’Regan flexed some political muscle and cruised to an easy victory over write-in candidate Carolyn Vega, 1,449-390.
The two contested races on the School Committee showed former Chelsea High graduate Robert Pereira beating Kizzi Reyes in District 5, 147-85.
Also, in an open seat, Yessenia Alfaro-Alvarez barely edged out Elizabeth Shahinian, 188-177.
Newcomer Diana Maldonado was unopposed in Dis
Ticket topper Roy Avellaneda (right) – a new Council at-Large member – with Chelsea Cable Director Duke Bradley during a break in the Chelsea Cable live Election Night broadcast.
trict 4 and received 150 votes.
Newcomer Kelly Garcia won District 7 with 63 votes in District 7.
District 1 Rosemarie Carlisle, District 2 Jeanette Velez, District 3 Richard Maronski, and District 6 Ana Hernandez all won in unopposed races.