Everett might be all-in
on the 4 a.m. extending liquor license for Encore Boston Harbor, but
surrounding cities like Chelsea aren’t so excited.
In comments this week,
Boston Mayor Martin Walsh and Chelsea City Manager Tom Ambrosino said they
weren’t in favor of Encore’s request for a limited 4 a.m. liquor license from
the Massachusetts Gaming Commission (MGC). The request is currently under
review and in a public comment period. It would only apply to those actively
engaged in gaming, and the last call would be 3:30 a.m. Most other liquor
licenses have a 2 a.m. cutoff.
Chelsea City Manager Tom
Ambrosino said he doesn’t support the idea, seeing no advantage to Chelsea in
having a luxury casino open late just a few hundred yards from the Chelsea city
“That would have no
positive benefit to the City of Chelsea, so it would not be something I would
favor,” he said.
Mayor Martin Walsh agreed
with those sentiments as well.
“When the Legislature
wrote the bill to have casino gaming, it was a 2 a.m. liquor license, which I
voted on,” said Mayor Walsh. “I think that at this point in time, we should get
the casino open, and see how the 2 a.m. license works. If there is a need, if
there is a desire, or if there is a concern that it hampers the business, then
I think we should explore the opportunity of maybe going until 3 a.m. or 4 a.m.
But right now, at opening, closing at 2 a.m. – let’s see what it looks like.
You can’t say there are concerns there until it’s open. I would request we wait
and then have a full vetting. Right now it needs to be opened and see how it
all works with a 2 a.m. closing.”
Meanwhile, Everett Mayor
Carlo DeMaria said the later closing hour is critical to the casino being an
international destination, as no such 2 a.m. rules apply in other locales where
Wynn Resorts operates.
“The City of Everett is
committed to supporting the success of the Encore Boston Harbor Resort,” he said.
“In order for it to be a destination for an international clientele, the resort
needs to be able to offer these clients a cocktail during the time they
play. At 2 a.m., all the bars and restaurants will be closed, and drinks
will only be served to those on the casino floor by a trained and certified
server. Over-serving and irresponsible behavior will not be tolerated.”
He added that State
Police, Everett Police and Encore security would be on site during the late
hours and transportation services would be available for guests.
Walsh said he realizes
that the Springfield casino already has a 4 a.m. license, but he also added
that the circumstances are different in Everett. He said there are a lot of
other cities and towns in the immediate area without such licenses. He said
there has to be a dialog with everyone after the first six months.
“I’m not going to assume
they’ll do 4 a.m.,” he said. “I’ll ask the Gaming Commission to be respectful
of the surrounding cities and towns and see how the process works and see how
the casino does in its first six months. Then we’ll revisit it and have a
conversation and dialog at this point.
“We filed legislation (in
Boston) a few years ago to open some of the bars and clubs later,” he
continued. “So, that’s why I think you need a six-month vetting. Let’s assume
for a moment the Gaming Commission grants the 4 a.m. license, that puts a lot
of businesses in surrounding cities and town, including Boston, at a serious
disadvantage. I think let’s wait and see what the 2 a.m. does…It’s not simply
opening the casino until 4 a.m. It’s about having a conversation about other
cities and towns and their licenses and what would happen in their
The MGC is expected to talk more about the 4 a.m. license application at
its next meeting on May 22.
City Manager Thomas Ambrosino presented a
city budget just short of $181,500,000 for Fiscal Year 2020 to the City Council
The proposed budget funds city expenditures
at $86,095,981 and the schools at $95,391,784 for a total budget of
$181,487,765. This budget is about $6.5 million more than the FY19 budget, an
increase of 3.71 percent.
“The FY20 budget continues support for many
programs we have implemented over the past few years,” Ambrosino stated in a
letter to the City Council.
The City Manager is proposing full funding
for social services programs in the downtown, including the Navigators and
Youth Navigator program. The Health and Human Services budget also includes a
new social services contract to support the ISD housing program.
The budget does include new positions in
three city departments — E-911, DPW, and Elder Services — and an increase
from a part-time to a full-time position in the Licensing Department. The E-911
increase, a total of three new full-time positions, follows a personnel review
by the department’s new director.
Increases in the DPW include personnel for a
new 311 system as well as a group of new hires required for the city to operate
its own Water and Sewer Department.
The FY20 budget includes funds in salary
reserve to cover the anticipated costs of ongoing union negotiations with City
Hall employees. With the exception of the police and fire union contracts, all
municipal union contracts expire on June 30 of this year.
•In other business, the Council approved an
order proposed by councillors Giovanni Recupero, Enio Lopez, Luis Tejada, and
Damali Vidot requiring that all street cleanings should be limited to the same
amount of time in every street. Lopez and Recupero both noted that residents
who live in areas where they have to move their cars for five hours for street
cleaning face greater hardship than those where street cleaning is limited to
•The council also held a public hearing on
zoning amendments that will allow for outdoor dining and improved signage and
facades in the city.
business owners and city officials spoke in support of the zoning amendments,
noting it would improve the look of the downtown and make for a livelier, safer
Current and former
municipal employees crowded into Monday night’s City Council meeting as the
council took up a vote to allow City Manager Thomas Ambrosino to negotiate
changes to the city’s group health insurance policies.
Most of those employees
did not leave happily or quietly as the council voted 8-2 to grant Ambrosino
that authority to negotiate the changes. Councillors Roy Avellaneda and Yamir
Rodriguez voted against the order, while Councillor Calvin T. Brown was not
present at the meeting.
The city’s current group
health plan is governed by a three-year agreement with the Public Employee
Committee (PEC) that expires on June 30 of this year.
“During the months of
November through March, I did attempt to negotiate with the PEC a new
multi-year agreement that would provide some cost savings to the group health
plan,” Ambrosino stated in a letter to the council. “Unfortunately, I have not
been able to reach agreement with the unions.”
General Laws, Ambrosino stated, in the absence of a new agreement, the old PEC
agreement will remain in effect indefinitely. Without City Council action,
Ambrosino said he cannot put any health care cost savings in place.
The action approved by the
City Council allows the city to take advantage of recent state legislation that
allows municipalities to implement cost saving plan design changes on its own
if no agreement can be reached with the PEC as long as the city agrees to share
a percentage of its first year cost savings with the unions.
With the newly granted
authority by the council, the City Manager said he will negotiate reasonable
design changes to the city’s group health policies, likely by imposing
deductibles in line with deductibles paid for health insurance by state
Ambrosino said even with
any changes, Chelsea will always have health insurance at least as good as that
provided to Massachusetts public employees.
However, a letter to the
City Council submitted by the Chelsea Public Employees Committee outlined over
two dozen reasons why members believe the adoption of the changes to the group
health insurance should not be adopted.
“The PEC strongly believes
that the adoption of Sections 21-23 is inappropriate and premature for multiple
reasons: the Self-Insurance Trust Fund is running about a $2 million surplus;
the PEC has agreed to apply any surplus to reduce future health insurance
costs; City Manager Thomas Ambrosino wants the sickest families among City
employees and retirees to pay $1 million more on an annual basis currently paid
by the City; the PEC and City Manager Thomas Ambrosino agree that no changes to
employee/retiree health insurance are needed until FY2022; Ambrosino has failed
to bargain in good faith for a successor PEC agreement; a grievance, including
an alleged unfair labor practice, are pending at this time; and Sections 21-23
will effectively disable bargaining on health insurance,” the letter summarizes.
City Council President
Damali Vidot noted that her husband works for the Department of Public Works
and that any changes in health insurance would directly affect her. However,
she said the changes are necessary to allow Ambrosino to negotiate with city
“We hire the Town Manager
to negotiate with the unions, and I’m not comfortable when he does not have all
the tools needed for the negotiations,” said Vidot.
Vidot she said she hopes
Ambrosino can go back to the unions with the new negotiating tools and find
common ground with the unions. In addition to wanting the best for city
employees, Vidot said the council has a fiscal responsibility for the entire
The council president also
said that there has been some miscommunication on the issue, especially when it
comes to retirees. Vidot said changes to group health insurance plans would
only affect a very few retirees who do not qualify for Medicare.
District 1 Councillor
Robert Bishop said he agreed that the City Manager should have all the tools
available as he negotiates with the city’s union.
As the vote took place, many in the audience shouted and voiced their
displeasure, with several people stating the council should be ashamed of their
vote. The meeting came to a brief halt as the crowd noisily filed out of the
council meeting, with several audience members individually appealing to
The MBTA’s Fiscal and Management
Control Board approved a $32.3 million contract that will result in the
relocation and construction of a new, fully-accessible Chelsea Commuter Rail
When complete, the new Chelsea Station will
be an intermodal facility that connects the Newburyport/Rockport Commuter Rail
Lines to the Silver Line 3-Chelsea service, which began operating in
“This is a key investment in our Commuter
Rail infrastructure that will allow for faster boarding and improved
accessibility for people of all abilities,” said MBTA General Manager Steve
Poftak. “Once complete, the new station will serve as a multimodal connection
that will give our customers the choice of traveling to North Station on the
Commuter Rail or South Station on SL3 from a single point.”
Featuring high-level platforms, canopies,
benches, and windscreens, the brand new station will also include new
sidewalks, landscaping, stairways, lighting, communications systems, and
structures for maintenance and bus operations personnel. The project also
includes the demolition of the existing Chelsea Station, upgrades to railroad
signal systems, and new traffic signal system installations at local
The project to construct and relocate
Chelsea Station aims to relieve traffic congestion and overcrowding on existing
area bus routes in Chelsea while also providing better transit options to
environmental justice populations through improved accessibility to employment
opportunities in downtown Boston and the Seaport district.
The project also includes the installation
of transit signal priority improvements for the SL3-Chelsea along with improved
operational efficiency and the incorporation of green operations elements at
the new Chelsea Station. Greenhouse gas emissions will also be reduced by
increasing the transit mode share and decreasing the idle time of commuter rail
and BRT vehicles.
The Chelsea Commuter Rail Station Project
was advertised in February 2019 with bids open in April 2019. After six bids
were received, the Chelsea Commuter Rail Station contract was awarded to A.A.
Will Corporation for $32,367,200.
could start as early as this summer, with project completion estimated for late
After viewing multiple surveillance videos
of patrons falling off stools, being overserved, urinating in public, getting
groped, and laid out on the sidewalk by the front door after closing time, the
Licensing Commission last week suspended the Chelsea Walk Pub’s liquor license
for 10 weeks.
The attorney for the Pub argued that the
Broadway bar has avoided violations in the past. But for Commission members,
the multiple incidents brought before it at its April 3 meeting were serious
enough to warrant the harsh judgment.
The Licensing Commission found the Chelsea
Walk Pub violated City ordinances by overserving patrons, selling liquor to an
intoxicated person, creating a noise or disorderly disturbance, and failing to
provide video surveillance. The majority of the violations resulted from
incidents responded to by the Police Department late last November.
In a letter to the Licensing Commission,
City Manager Thomas Ambrosino urged the commission not to take the reported
“A liquor license is a privilege and not a
right,” the City Manager stated.
The majority of the April 3 hearing revolved
around the showing of video surveillance footage from a number of the
Police highlighted one patron at the end of
the bar who had three drinks in front of him before stashing an unopened beer
in his jacket while the bartender wasn’t looking.
Meanwhile, police pointed out that at the
other end of the bar, a woman sat with two pitchers of beer in front of her
with no one else drinking from the mugs. In addition, the video showed the
woman encouraging another patron to put his hand down her shirt and grope her
Police Captain Keith Houghton said both
incidents violated the city alcohol serving ordinances.
Attorney Jeffrey Rosario Turco, representing
the Pub, put up a defense to the evidence, noting several times that the
patrons who were alleged to have been overserved seemed steady on their feet
and not intoxicated.
“With all due respect, that woman allowed a
man to go down her shirt with two pitchers of beer in front of her,” said City
Solicitor Cheryl Watson Fisher. “There are implications all over the place.”
Additional video and evidence showed a
patron leaving the bar and urinating outside on the sidewalk and a patron
weaving into the street before being spotted by a police officer.
Licensing Commission member Roseann
Bongiovanni was unmoved by Turco’s “not swaying” defense when it came to video
of one patron who left the bar then went back in after being allegedly
“He’s leaning up against the way, that’s why
he’s not swaying,” said Bongiovanni. “That’s some good evidence you have
Most damning was an incident that showed
several patrons and a bartender struggling for nearly 10 minutes to carry an
alleged intoxicated patron out the door after closing time. Once the man was
laid on the sidewalk, the bartender went back inside and locked the front door
of the bar.
“The bartender quickly closed the door and leaves
him out flat, leaving him pretty much to us,” said Houghton.
Turco did not dispute the evidence in that
incident, but said that the bartender in the video had been fired.
Chelsea Walk Pub owner Angela Palmieri said
the main problem has been that her staff has not stepped up.
“They don’t listen to what I tell them to
do,” she said.
While the Pub hasn’t come before the
Licensing Commission in recent memory for violation, Bongiovanni said it has
largely been because there weren’t City resources to police the establishment
before. She said the Chelsea Walk Pub has a long history of shenanigans.
“There have been so many instances at the
Chelsea Walk Pub,” she said. “These are just the ones you got caught for; it is
a disgrace to the city.”
In addition to the
10-week liquor license suspension, the Licensing Commission also voted to
reduce the bar’s operating hours from 8 a.m. to 1 a.m. to noon to 10 p.m.
The School Committee passed a $95.4 million
School Budget last week, but it was passed with less than a majority of the
total number of nine committee seats.
The budget, which passed with a $1.9 million
funding gap that led to the elimination of 10 teaching positions, was approved
by a 4-2 vote.
School Committee members Rosemarie Carlisle
and Frank DePatto voted against the budget, while board member Jeanette Velez
and Chair Richard Maronski recused themselves from the vote, citing relatives
who work for the School Department. Last week, Julio Hernandez resigned from
the Committee and his seat has yet to be filled.
School Committee members and administrators
said it has been a long struggle to present a budget that attempts to meet the
needs of the Chelsea schools.
Supt. Mary Bourque and City Manager Thomas
Ambrosino were among those who noted that falling enrollments in the Chelsea
schools, as well as an antiquated state funding formula that underfunds urban
communities such as Chelsea, were the main culprits in the budget cuts.
“I’ve spent a lot of the time with the
superintendent trying to provide city support for the budget,” said Ambrosino.
“The City is really trying to do its fair share.”
That included the City providing an
additional $1.5 million to the schools to address budget shortfalls.
“Every new tax dollar I can raise in Fiscal
Year 2020 is going to the School Department,” said the city manager.
Regardless of how the School Committee ended
up voting on the budget, Ambrosino said the $95.5 million figure is the figure
he would present to the City Council as the school share of the overall City
“The budget (Bourque) presented is fair and
reasonable,” said Ambrosino.
Once the budget is approved, Ambrosino said
attention should be turned towards advocating for change to the Chapter 70
state education funding formula on Beacon Hill.
Bourque said she agreed that the time is now
to fix the state funding formula, noting that Chelsea schools will be
underfunded $17 million by the state.
The other factor leading to cuts in the budget
is falling enrollment, Bourque said. Between January of 2018 and January of
this year, she said Chelsea schools have lost 217 students. That is part of a
larger trend of falling enrollment over nearly a decade, according to the
Carlisle voted against the proposed budget,
but said the problem with the $95.4 million figure laid not with the City, but
with the state.
“The problem is with the state,” said
Carlisle. “They are not doing the right thing, and we have to send them a
School Committee member Ana Hernandez backed
the budget, but said it wasn’t a decision made lightly.
“The votes we make are very hard,” she said.
“This budget is what we dread every year. We have to make a decision for the
best of the entire school system.”
But for DePatto, further cuts to teaching
positions was a bridge too far to support the FY ‘20 budget. He said the
schools laid off seven teachers in 2017, 20 in 2018, 10 in 2019, and have
projected another 10 for 2020.
“Forty seven teachers and 25 paraprofessionals,”
he said. “When is it going to stop? I can’t vote for this budget (when) I don’t
support these cuts.”
School Committee member Yessenia
Alfaro-Alvarez voted in support of the budget, stating that it was in the best
interest of the City’s students to pass the budget, and also noting that
Chelsea is hamstrung by declining enrollments and inequities in the state
•In other business, the Committee voted to
forgo School Choice for the 2019-20 school year.
Committee also approved a field trip to New York City for high school and
middle school REACH students to participate in the Andover Bread Loaf Writing
Conference in May.
For as long as jets have rumbled over
Chelsea as they land at and depart from Logan Airport, City officials have
struggled with getting state and federal officials to help mitigate the noise from
that air traffic.
Monday night, District 6 City Councillor
Giovanni Recupero introduced an order asking City Manager Tom Ambrosino to look
at renegotiating a deal with Massport to bring back the window and
soundproofing program to the city.
“People deserve a little more consideration
than they have been given,” said Recupero.
The Councillor said he would like to see
Massport provide soundproof windows for residents suffering excessive noise
from plane traffic, as it has done in the past.
“I’d like to get them back to the table and
figure out a way to help with the problem,” Recupero said.
Councillor-At-Large Roy Avellaneda said he
appreciated Recupero’s efforts to get Massport back to the table to discuss
sound mitigation, but that he didn’t have high hopes that it would be
“Whenever the City Manager has approached
Massport, the answer has been that it is a nonstarter; they have done their
program,” said Avellaneda.
Avellaneda said he has been working with
City Manager Tom Ambrosino to find a company to undertake an independent sound
study of noise from the airport. But, he said it has been very difficult to
find a company qualified to do that study.
If a company is found that can perform an
independent sound study, Avellaneda said he hopes it has the support of his
On the positive side, Avellaneda said he
attended a recent Massport meeting with airport communities in which officials
stated that a new Massport sound study is underway. He said this study will
take into account items that a study released in 2017 did not take into
account, such as the impact of hills on sound and the resonating sound of
The 2017 study was conducted by the Center
for Research on Environmental and Social Stressors in Housing Across the Life
Course (CRESSH), which is a division of the BU School of Public Health.
That report showed that flights over Chelsea
have nearly doubled between 2011 and 2015, and that certain health effects
associated with airplane noise are very high in Chelsea.
But getting Massport to kick in for
additional noise mitigation efforts has been an uphill battle.
“Confronted with the increase in air
traffic, their response has been, ‘But our planes are quieter,’” said
The Councillor has been pushing for the
independent noise study since at least the time the 2017 airport noise study
“We (can) do a real noise study with proper
equipment and prepare to say we have proof that our community is impacted and
possibly prepare to embark on a lawsuit against MassPort and the FAA,” he said
at the time.
•In other business, the Council unanimously
approved sending a home rule petition to the state legislature that will allow
for the construction of the new Innes Housing Development.
•Recupero introduced an order asking the
City Manager look into hiring another animal control officer for the purpose of
issuing fines to people that don’t clean up after their dogs.
•Councillor-At-Large Leo Robinson introduced
orders asking the City Manager for updates on the City’s master plan and the
status of the Salvation Army building on Broadway. The Council approved taking
the building by eminent domain in 2017.
Councillor Robert Bishop was absent from Monday night’s meeting, but with good
reason. He was celebrating his 35th anniversary with his wife. Happy
anniversary to the Bishops.
An exhibit by the Chelsea Hunger Network is
now installed at Gallery 456 and will remain until the day of its community
fundraising event on April 18, the 8th Annual Chelsea Empty Bowls.
Since September of 2018, 19 groups have
convened over 300 “community artists” in Chelsea to paint a variety of ceramic
bowls and mugs. A selection of these
colorful pieces of practical art, all fired in the kilns of Salem State’s Art +
Design department, are now on display in the gallery. Next to the exhibit of the decorated
ceramics, a collage depicts various artists showing off their work as well as
groups and individuals at work. Many
photographed are widely recognized community figures including Chelsea’s City
Manager, Tom Ambrosino.
Another section of the gallery displays
large color posters revealing the identity of the 19 participating groups and
gives additional background on the Chelsea Hunger Network. An infographic
outlines the contributing factors leading to an increase in food insecurity and
hunger in our community.
The 8th Annual
Chelsea Empty Bowls event will take place on April 18, from 5-7 p.m. at the
Williams School at 180 Walnut St. Choose one of the hundreds of bowls and mugs
and serve yourself from an all-you-can-eat menu of delicious clam chowder,
chili, soups, and Toscanini’s ice cream. Tickets are $20 ($25 at the door) and
can be purchased online at www.eventbrite.com under “Chelsea Empty Bowls”. Children under 8 years old are free.
A revised affordable housing development at
the corner of Broadway and Clinton Street is back before City boards, and now
it features fewer units with all at affordable rates.
Late last year, the Zoning Board of Appeals
(ZBA) narrowly denied the 42 unit affordable- and market-rate residential
development at 1001 Broadway (Midas site) in a vote that was based on creating
more homeownership opportunities in the City. The project included nine units
of market-rate housing and enhanced access to the Mill Creek waterfront.
The Suffolk County Land Court remanded the
controversial Zoning Board affordable housing denial on Broadway back to the
ZBA with a revised plan.
Monday night, the revised version of the
development, a partnership between the Traggorth Companies and The Neighborhood
Developers (TND), was back before the ZBA. The revised plan is an attempt to
address the concerns of the board and neighbors, according to Dave Traggorth of
the Traggorth Companies.
“Our goals have not changed,” said
Traggorth. “It is to create affordable homes for Chelsea residents and to
provide public access to Mill Creek.”
The major revisions to the proposed $15
million project include cutting the total number of units from 42 to 38, making
all the units affordable, and eliminating the fifth story of the building that
had been proposed for the Broadway side of the development.
The commercial space on the first floor in
the initial proposal has also been eliminated.
“We have reviewed the plans based on the ZBA
recommendations, and the commercial space will now be a community room,”
The project needs special permits due to a
slightly larger than allowed lot coverage, and for not meeting City parking
requirements. The Broadway housing will have 42 parking spots, where 52 are
required by the city.
Thirty one of those parking spaces will be
available for the public to access Mill Creek from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. In
addition, Traggorth said the developers will give the city $15,000 for
intersection improvements in the area.
With the decrease in units and the
elimination of the commercial space, TND Project Manager Steve Laferriere said
there will be less of an impact on parking in traffic in the area than the
District 3 City Councillor Joe Perlatonda,
who represents the area where the affordable housing will be built, said he is
still opposed to the project, citing a burst of recent development in the city
that will increase parking and traffic.
Perlatonda said the parking and traffic
issues around Broadway and Clinton Street are already a nightmare for
neighbors, and that the Traggorth/TND project will only make it worse. He said
the City should take a look at other uses for the property, such as a new
public library on Mill Creek.
But the majority of people who spoke during
the public hearing said they supported the creation of sorely needed new
affordable units in Chelsea, and praised the efforts TND has already made to
create safe and modern affordable units in the city. A recent affordable
housing lottery in the city saw more than 3,000 applicants for 34 units, with
more than 1,200 of those applications coming from Chelsea residents.
“There is a clear need for affordable
housing as rents continue to go up in the Chelsea area,” said resident Sandy
City Manager Tom Ambrosino said he continues
to support the TND/Traggorth partnership.
“The number one complaint I receive as City
Manager from residents is the lack of affordable housing,” said Ambrosino.
Ambrosino said he understands the concerns
about traffic and parking, but said the impacts of any project has to be
weighed against the benefits, and that the benefits of affordable housing at
Broadway and Clinton tip the scales in favor of the project.
While state law prohibits the developers
from offering the affordable units to Chelsea residents only, the developers
said they would work to make sure the maximum units allowable are for Chelsea
The Planning Board will take up the project at
its March 26 meeting, and then it will come back to the ZBA at its April 9
meeting for a possible vote, according to ZBA Chair Janice Tatarka.
The City Council has asked that City Manager
Tom Ambrosino use the next month to figure out some new parking strategies for
the city instead of spending a hefty sum on a major Parking Study.
Ambrosino said the Council had instructed
him to put out a bid for a parking study late last year, but there was only one
bidder on the project. That bid did not include the whole city and was more
On Monday, the Council held a Committee
meeting to discuss the next steps, steps that don’t include spending such a sum
on a study.
“The Council at the end of the meeting on
Monday wanted to explore the idea of internal remediation before proceeding
with an expensive outside study,” he said.
Ambrosino said he and his administration
will spend the next month “brainstorming” some ideas and recommendations to
help with the parking bottleneck in many areas of the City – including the
Ambrosino said they do see it as a problem
in several aspects of the city.
“There’s no question it’s a problem in the
city,” he said. “There are way too many cars and not enough parking spaces.
There is no simple solution to that problem. Long-time, we do have an agreement
as part of the Tobin Bridge Viaduct project to add 135 spaces only a short walk
from downtown. That might help a little bit, but that’s three years away.”
One solution he will not suggest is to
reduce parking requirements for new development. While many might think that is
counter to solving a parking problem, many planners now believe that one
solution to reducing the numbers of cars is to build developments without
That won’t be a solution he suggests again,
after having had lower parking requirements rejected by the Council only two
“I don’t see the Council reducing parking any
time soon,” he said. “It’s not something I’m going to re-submit.”